I started the morning as I usually do. I switched on the computer, hit the “brew”
button on my single cup coffee maker, and walked outside to retrieve one of my
two local papers (the other one arrives a little later each morning).
I finished the login process on the computer. I fixed my coffee with creamer and sugar
substitute. I perused the front page of
the paper. I sat down, with reading
glasses in position, and I started reading.
I am thankful when I see positive stories about our schools,
and the local paper had two excellent stories on the front page today. One story was about our success on
standardized tests despite some challenges.
The other story detailed our annual recognition program for teachers,
support staff, and volunteers. There was
even a great picture of the three folks representing the three categories on
page 1.
Then I got to page A4.
The editorial was a bit perplexing.
The “Our View” op-ed piece states, “Transparency is needed in the $3.7
million school request.”
I noted and agreed with one statement in the body of the
text, “The lack of state funding was costly.”
That’s been so true, and I’ve written extensively about the “budget dance”
I’ve done each year as superintendent (excluding my first year since the budget
was already approved).
Then a line hit me, “We take issue that the school board was
not open enough with the public and the council members with those figures.”
I can’t think of any additional ways to communicate it. I’ve shared this information constantly. It’s been part of our Board meetings. We’ve talked about the “funding cliff.” We’ve given the figures in exhibits, and I’ve
shared my concerns with every partnership meeting in which I participate.
It seems I’m always writing, talking, and e-mailing folks
about the budget. I’ve presented
extensively at community meetings about school finance (e.g., Republican
meetings, Democratic meetings, League of Women Voters meetings, Rotaries, men’s
groups…). I have bombarded our staff
with e-mails to update them on the status of our budget (this year I’ve tried
to hold off on so many until more facts were known).
Every Board meeting is videoed and posted the next day on
our website. There are loads of
exhibits, too.
I think that’s being “transparent.”
But here’s the clincher.
The editorial writer states, “We also take exception to the threats that
a failure to approve the $3.7 million – and the tax increase it brings would
result in teacher layoffs.”
Hey, we’ve been cutting everywhere to avoid that
reality. We’ve made extensive cuts so as
not to balance the budget on the backs of teachers. The goal must be to protect the classroom and
the person critically important for our students’ success: The Teacher.
So, I appreciate County Council taking the time to receive this
information from the Board of Trustees during the special joint meeting. I also appreciate the 3-2 vote on our budget
request that Council made later that evening.
I feel we’ve been very transparent in this process. I think I might need a second cup of coffee this morning.
An Update: Dr. Michael
Thorsland, Assistant Superintendent for Operational Services, felt an obligation
to respond to the editor since he was quoted in the editorial. He responded by sharing information from the
Board’s April 16 meeting. You can see
the budget exhibit by
clicking
here (note the very top of Page 1 where it states the total deficit is over
$7 million) or by watching the meeting (
click here)
at about 27:35 mark.